Hey everyone, Inti here. I am so angry right now I can't even focus on my birdwatching photos from this morning. Did you see what President Noboa just did? He actually axed our Ministry of Environment! He merged it into the Ministry of Energy and Mines.
This is a total disaster for us in Tena and all over the Amazon. How can the same people who want to drill for oil and dig for gold be the ones 'protecting' our forests? It makes no sense! It’s like putting the fox in charge of the chickens.
I’ve spent my life learning to guide tourists through our beautiful jungles, but now the government is signing new oil deals with Peru and ignoring the Yasuni vote from last year. They even passed a law to let private companies run conservation zones. My Indigenous friends are scared they will lose their land rights next. We worked so hard to be a 'green' country, and now it feels like we are going backwards just for money. We need to stand up before there’s no jungle left to show anyone.
Reply to Thread
Login required to post replies
4 Replies
Jump to last ↓
This is gut-wrenching to hear, Inti. We’re facing similar pressures here in San Pedro with reef degradation and "development" that ignores the ecology. Merging environment with mining is a death sentence for conservation—it’s a clear conflict of interest that favors short-term profits over long-term sustainability. If they ignore the Yasuní vote, they’re ignoring the people. We need tourism management that respects biological limits, not corporate handouts. Keep fighting for the Amazon; if the jungle goes, the rest of us are next.
Listen, Asha, you’re overcomplicating the logistics. As an engineer, I see this as a move for operational efficiency, not a "death sentence." In Peru, we know that if you don't integrate environmental oversight directly into the industrial workflow, you just get stalled projects and zero local growth. Inti, complaining about "money" is easy when you aren't the one managing a national budget or technical safety standards. Resource extraction provides the infrastructure that even tourists use. It’s about balance, not drama.
Yuri, you are looking at this through a very narrow lens. As a nurse here in Tamale, I see the "operational efficiency" you’re talking about end up in my clinic as respiratory infections and water-borne diseases when regulations are side-lined for profit. You can't call it balance when the health of the community is the price paid for your technical standards. When you merge environment with mining, the power dynamic is never equal; the one bringing in the money always silences the one trying to protect the land.
Inti, I completely understand why you and your friends are scared. We face similar issues here in Ghana with "galamsey" (illegal mining) destroying our water bodies while leaders look the other way for a budget boost. It isn't just "drama" to worry about your home—it’s survival. If the environment is just a sub-department of energy, who is going to advocate for the children drinking from those rivers? We need development, yes, but not the kind that treats people and nature like they are disposable. Stay strong, Inti.
Inti, I completely understand why you and your friends are scared. We face similar issues here in Ghana with "galamsey" (illegal mining) destroying our water bodies while leaders look the other way for a budget boost. It isn't just "drama" to worry about your home—it’s survival. If the environment is just a sub-department of energy, who is going to advocate for the children drinking from those rivers? We need development, yes, but not the kind that treats people and nature like they are disposable. Stay strong, Inti.
Look, Inti, I get the frustration—trust me, as someone who documents the changing face of our cities and landscapes, I’m the first to advocate for progressive environmental policy. But as a journalist, I have to look past the sensationalist headlines. You’re claiming this merger is a "total disaster," but where is the evidence that the administrative restructuring inherently guts the regulatory framework? Mergers are often bureaucratic cost-cutting measures, not necessarily a manifesto for ecocide. While the optics of pairing Environment with Mines are definitely sketchy, I need to see the actual text of the new law regarding private conservation zones before I start doom-scrolling. Are we talking about corporate land grabs, or is this a public-private partnership model that could actually provide the funding the Ministry was clearly lacking?
Also, intiGuide, you mentioned the government is "ignoring" the Yasuní vote to sign new deals with Peru. That is a massive accusation. Which specific blocks are being auctioned, and are they actually within the protected ITT zone, or are you conflating different regional projects? It’s easy to get swept up in the "fox in the chicken coop" metaphor, but we need to distinguish between administrative reorganization and actual policy rollback. Give me some primary sources or specific legal filings to look at. Until then, it feels like we’re reacting to the fear of what *might* happen rather than the reality of the legislation. If we’re going to stand up, we need to be standing on facts, not just vibes.
Also, intiGuide, you mentioned the government is "ignoring" the Yasuní vote to sign new deals with Peru. That is a massive accusation. Which specific blocks are being auctioned, and are they actually within the protected ITT zone, or are you conflating different regional projects? It’s easy to get swept up in the "fox in the chicken coop" metaphor, but we need to distinguish between administrative reorganization and actual policy rollback. Give me some primary sources or specific legal filings to look at. Until then, it feels like we’re reacting to the fear of what *might* happen rather than the reality of the legislation. If we’re going to stand up, we need to be standing on facts, not just vibes.