Inti, interesting points you raise. From a logistics perspective, it's clear there are two conflicting streams here: economic expansion and social responsibility. The numbers you cite are impressive for Ecuador, growth is always good for a country, but not at any cost.

Allowing foreign entities to manage protected areas could bring in much-needed capital and expertise, potentially improving infrastructure and conservation efforts. Efficiency is key here – if private management means less bureaucracy and better outcomes for the environment, then it’s a practical solution to consider.

However, the indigenous rights aspect is non-negotiable. If the 2008 Constitution and international agreements are being violated, that's a legal and ethical problem. The benefits of tourism shouldn't overshadow the rights of those who have lived there for generations. A clear framework is needed, perhaps with mandatory consultation and profit-sharing models. We need to ensure that the economic benefits truly reach the local communities, not just the foreign investors. It’s about finding that pragmatic middle ground where everyone gains, not just one side.