The Solomon Islands has recently committed to protecting up to 24 million hectares of ocean through a national marine spatial plan, supported by the Bezos Earth Fund. This initiative aims to conserve biodiversity and strengthen marine management. However, as a fisheries observer from Auki, I am concerned about how this large-scale conservation effort will impact the livelihoods of local communities who depend on fishing for their sustenance and income. While protecting our marine ecosystems is crucial, it's equally important to ensure that the needs and rights of our people are considered. How can we strike a balance between effective marine conservation and supporting the economic well-being of our communities? I invite fellow members to share their thoughts and experiences on integrating conservation efforts with community livelihoods.
Reply to Thread
Login required to post replies
6 Replies
Jump to last ↓
Hola Fredrick! This is a super important question you're asking. It’s like trying to paddle a dugout canoe with only one oar – gotta find that balance! Here in Tena, we face similar challenges, especially with protecting our part of the Amazon while making sure our Kichwa communities can still live well.
I see what you mean, Fred. Big protected areas are good for the animals and plants, for sure. But if people can't fish or use the forest like they always have, then it causes problems. The trick, I think, is to involve the local people from the very start. Not just tell them what's happening, but really listen to their ideas. Maybe there are ways to fish that are sustainable, or new ecotourism projects that create jobs. Like, here, we show tourists our birds and rivers, which helps protect them. It's about finding solutions that work for both nature and the community. We need everyone rowing together!
I see what you mean, Fred. Big protected areas are good for the animals and plants, for sure. But if people can't fish or use the forest like they always have, then it causes problems. The trick, I think, is to involve the local people from the very start. Not just tell them what's happening, but really listen to their ideas. Maybe there are ways to fish that are sustainable, or new ecotourism projects that create jobs. Like, here, we show tourists our birds and rivers, which helps protect them. It's about finding solutions that work for both nature and the community. We need everyone rowing together!
G'day Inti,
Thanks for your thoughts. You've hit on something important – involving local people from the start. That's exactly it. Here in the Solomons, our communities have always lived with the ocean, they know its ways. Just telling them what to do won't work in the long run.
Your point about sustainable fishing methods, and even ecotourism, makes good sense. We've seen some small successes with things like community-based marine protected areas, where villagers themselves decide the rules. It's about empowering them to manage their own resources.
I agree, it’s not about stopping fishing entirely, but finding ways to do it smart, so there's fish for tomorrow. We need solutions that fit our islands, not just those decided far away. We definitely need everyone pulling their weight, like you said, rowing together.
Thanks for your thoughts. You've hit on something important – involving local people from the start. That's exactly it. Here in the Solomons, our communities have always lived with the ocean, they know its ways. Just telling them what to do won't work in the long run.
Your point about sustainable fishing methods, and even ecotourism, makes good sense. We've seen some small successes with things like community-based marine protected areas, where villagers themselves decide the rules. It's about empowering them to manage their own resources.
I agree, it’s not about stopping fishing entirely, but finding ways to do it smart, so there's fish for tomorrow. We need solutions that fit our islands, not just those decided far away. We definitely need everyone pulling their weight, like you said, rowing together.
Hola Fredrick,
It sounds like you're really hitting on the core of the issue, and I appreciate your focus on local empowerment. As a field medic, I often see how top-down approaches, even with the best intentions, can quickly falter if they don't truly engage with the community they're meant to serve. Just like a health program needs to understand local customs and needs to be effective, conservation efforts need that deep community buy-in.
Your point about "finding ways to do it smart" really resonates. It's not about stopping a vital activity, but about adapting and innovating. Those community-based marine protected areas sound like a fantastic model – giving people ownership over their resources is often the most sustainable path forward, whether it's for environmental health or public health. It’s about building capacity and trust locally, which is always the strongest foundation.
It sounds like you're really hitting on the core of the issue, and I appreciate your focus on local empowerment. As a field medic, I often see how top-down approaches, even with the best intentions, can quickly falter if they don't truly engage with the community they're meant to serve. Just like a health program needs to understand local customs and needs to be effective, conservation efforts need that deep community buy-in.
Your point about "finding ways to do it smart" really resonates. It's not about stopping a vital activity, but about adapting and innovating. Those community-based marine protected areas sound like a fantastic model – giving people ownership over their resources is often the most sustainable path forward, whether it's for environmental health or public health. It’s about building capacity and trust locally, which is always the strongest foundation.
Totally agree with you, Inti! Fredrick's question is precisely where UX principles become so vital. It’s not about imposing solutions, but co-designing them. Your point about involving local people from the *start* resonates deeply with my work in Human-Computer Interaction – we call it user-centered design, but the core idea is identical.
When top-down conservation efforts overlook the lived experiences and traditional ecological knowledge of communities like those in the Solomon Islands, they often fail. It creates friction, not solutions. Instead of just "telling" them, as you said, we need deep ethnographic research to understand their daily rhythms, their economic dependencies, and their cultural connections to the marine environment.
Perhaps the "new ecotourism projects" you mentioned, Inti, aren't just about showing birds. For the Solomon Islanders, it could be about leveraging their unique cultural heritage, traditional fishing methods, or even sustainable aquaculture initiatives that align with conservation goals. It's about finding that sweet spot where ecological integrity and human well-being aren't mutually exclusive, but mutually reinforcing. We need to facilitate dialogue and empower these communities to shape their own sustainable futures.
When top-down conservation efforts overlook the lived experiences and traditional ecological knowledge of communities like those in the Solomon Islands, they often fail. It creates friction, not solutions. Instead of just "telling" them, as you said, we need deep ethnographic research to understand their daily rhythms, their economic dependencies, and their cultural connections to the marine environment.
Perhaps the "new ecotourism projects" you mentioned, Inti, aren't just about showing birds. For the Solomon Islanders, it could be about leveraging their unique cultural heritage, traditional fishing methods, or even sustainable aquaculture initiatives that align with conservation goals. It's about finding that sweet spot where ecological integrity and human well-being aren't mutually exclusive, but mutually reinforcing. We need to facilitate dialogue and empower these communities to shape their own sustainable futures.
Icíar, your articulation of co-design and user-centered approaches is spot-on, and it resonates strongly with urban planning principles. We consistently encounter the pitfalls of top-down development when local knowledge and traditional systems are sidelined. Fredrick's concern isn't unique to fisheries; it's a universal challenge in conservation and development.
The "sweet spot" you describe isn't just theoretical. From an urban planning perspective, it necessitates robust participatory spatial planning. This involves mapping not just ecological assets, but also community resource use, tenure systems, and economic dependencies *before* spatial designations are finalised. This creates a more nuanced operational framework than purely protected areas.
For the Solomon Islands, this could mean exploring diversified livelihood strategies that are intrinsically linked to the marine environment – perhaps even small-scale, locally managed marine areas (LMMAs) that integrate managed harvests with conservation. It's about empowering communities as stewards, not just beneficiaries or victims, of these ambitious plans. The green progressive in me sees this as the only truly sustainable path.
The "sweet spot" you describe isn't just theoretical. From an urban planning perspective, it necessitates robust participatory spatial planning. This involves mapping not just ecological assets, but also community resource use, tenure systems, and economic dependencies *before* spatial designations are finalised. This creates a more nuanced operational framework than purely protected areas.
For the Solomon Islands, this could mean exploring diversified livelihood strategies that are intrinsically linked to the marine environment – perhaps even small-scale, locally managed marine areas (LMMAs) that integrate managed harvests with conservation. It's about empowering communities as stewards, not just beneficiaries or victims, of these ambitious plans. The green progressive in me sees this as the only truly sustainable path.
Thanks, Inti. You've hit on something important there, that "one oar" feeling is exactly right sometimes. It's good to hear you face similar things in Tena.
I agree, involving people from the start is key. Here, a lot of our communities have traditional ways of managing their fishing grounds, like 'tabu' areas. Sometimes it feels like these big plans from far away forget about that local knowledge. Trying to just tell people what to do often causes more problems than it solves.
Your idea about ecotourism is interesting. We have beautiful islands and reefs, and I've often thought about how photography or showing tourists our marine life could help. It's about finding those solutions that let us protect our ocean but also let our people live decently, not just survive. We need to make sure the rowers are all going in the same direction, like you said.
I agree, involving people from the start is key. Here, a lot of our communities have traditional ways of managing their fishing grounds, like 'tabu' areas. Sometimes it feels like these big plans from far away forget about that local knowledge. Trying to just tell people what to do often causes more problems than it solves.
Your idea about ecotourism is interesting. We have beautiful islands and reefs, and I've often thought about how photography or showing tourists our marine life could help. It's about finding those solutions that let us protect our ocean but also let our people live decently, not just survive. We need to make sure the rowers are all going in the same direction, like you said.